top of page

Suffering and pain: The cornerstone of art

  • tamibrown76
  • Mar 24, 2013
  • 2 min read

There is a blog of an indie author, Cristian Mihai, which I really like to follow. In a recent blog entry he wrote about famous artists. Not artists that became rich from their art, but artists who moved people by writing books, making paintings or music pieces. The artists whose work stay with the audience for a long time after they die. The classics. What Cristian mentions is that most of these artists suffered. And most often, they suffered from tragic love. Somehow, that made their art amazing and memorable. Now, here’s my problem: I’m not suffering. I never felt that I was at the end of the road, leaning into a sink with hot water and a razor ready to cut. I never sat at the edge of a window with my feet hanging down 20 meters from the ground. I never slept on the doormat of a beloved one who didn’t even realize I exist. I’m not a person who likes to suffer, and if I do, I don’t like to do that for very long (the time that is maybe needed to make a good art piece). If I’m in the position where people around cause me to suffer, I first try to change that. If that doesn’t work, I leave. If I bring myself into a position of suffering, it will probably take me a few weeks to realize it, and then I will change it. If someone I fall in love with doesn’t realize I’m there or treats me in an undignified fashion, my suffering would last for a very short time. I show him the finger and turn my back. If he didn’t realize who I am, see who I can become for him, well - his mistake. There is a very strong instinctive and self-preserving logic in me that picks me up from the ground, dusts me off and nudges me forward to continue walking. So, going back to suffering and good art: what does that mean for the books I am writing? Are they not as good because I’m not a suffering type of a person? Should I change gear and suffer a little bit more in order to make my novels more memorable? Or maybe the suffering I had was deep enough, painful enough, to make my writing memorable, but luckily, short enough so that I could actually write about it afterwards? The question has no answer.

Recent Posts

See All
When writers panic!

Roughly speaking there are two types of writers. One group is planning a plot ahead of time. They make a 2 page- (or a 10 page-) chapter summary, and once finished, they write a book according to that

 
 
 
Casting call: Castles apply here

With 55000 words on my new book, I am about half way there. I don’t know what's with historical books, they always seem to be so long. Didn’t quite plan it like this, but as I write, I realize there i

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page